Exploring a potential downside of multi-modality by estimating the effect of the weather on travellers with different modality styles
Roel Faber, Olaf Jonkeren, Mathijs de Haas, Eric Molin, Maarten Kroesen
- Conference
- hEART 2020: 9th Symposium of the European Association for Research in Transportation (2020)
- Publication year
- 2020
Abstract
To inform policies aimed at more sustainable travel behaviour, previous research has looked into the concept of multi-modality. The notion underlying this research is that multi-modal travellers are more sustainable than unimodal travellers. This paper investigates a possible downside of more multi-modal travellers, which is their increased sensitivity to exogenous variation of the circumstances of the trip. The main idea of this paper is that multi-modal travellers resort to the use of the car more quickly when ‘car-favouring’ conditions present themselves. This idea is investigated by estimating the effects of the weather on mode choices of different segments of the population, using a latent class discrete choice model. Results show that the more multi-modal class is indeed more sensitive to changes in weather circumstances compared to the less multi-modal classes. To increase sustainability, more multi-modal behaviour then is not always desirable. Rather than the number of modes used, it is the sustainability of the modes that are part of the multi-modal behaviour that matters.
How to cite
Roel Faber; Olaf Jonkeren; Mathijs de Haas; Eric Molin; Maarten Kroesen (2020). Exploring a potential downside of multi-modality by estimating the effect of the weather on travellers with different modality styles. In: hEART 2020: 9th Symposium of the European Association for Research in Transportation.